Athlon Gold 7220C vs EPYC 7F72
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 119 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.45 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 12.99 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,450 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 48 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | SP3 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 April 2020 | 23 May 2023 |
Physical cores | 24 | 2 |
Threads | 48 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7F72 has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
Athlon Gold 7220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7F72 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F72 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.