AMD EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
60.54
+133%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 133% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money6.574.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years old)14 April 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,100
Current price$5500 $4919 (1.6x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 43% better value for money than EPYC 7F52.

Technical specs

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size8x 81 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors33,200 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketWRX8SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 60.54
+133%
EPYC 7F52 25.99

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 133% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 92987
+133%
EPYC 7F52 39923

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 133% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 60.54 25.99
Recency 8 March 2022 14 April 2020
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 155 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F52 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1429 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX or EPYC 7F52, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.