Athlon Gold 3150GE vs EPYC 7F52
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 273 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.94 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.49 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (5 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 4,940 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Athlon Gold 3150GE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 7F52 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon Gold 3150GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 585.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7F52 and AMD Athlon Gold 3150GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 3150GE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
