Xeon Gold 6135 vs EPYC 7F32
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 458 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.91 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 1 July 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 155 Watt |
EPYC 7F32 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Gold 6135, on the other hand, has 16.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
