Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U vs EPYC 7F32
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 624 | 1033 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.14 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 3.11 | 23.00 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021) |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (5 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | 23 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (per die) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 4x 74 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 15,200 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.19 | 8.12 |
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 16 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7F32 has a 62.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
