Ultra 7 270K Plus vs EPYC 7D13
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Arrow Lake Refresh (2026) |
| Release date | 10 November 2021 (4 years ago) | 11 March 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $299 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 36 | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 72 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 0.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 6x 81 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 24,900 million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7D13 and Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 29 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2021 | 11 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 36 | 24 |
| Threads | 72 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7D13 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 270K Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7D13 and Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7D13 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
