Ryzen AI 9 465 vs EPYC 7D12

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7D12
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 85 Watt
24.16
+85.4%

EPYC 7D12 outperforms Ryzen AI 9 465 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking276679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency11.9919.64
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameRome (2020)Gorgon Point (2026)
Release date14 April 2020 (5 years ago)January 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads6420
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (per die)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 74 mm2233 mm2
Number of transistors15,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FP8
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5, LPDDR5X

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7D12 24.16
+85.4%
Ryzen AI 9 465 13.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7D12 42285
+39.7%
Samples: 21
Ryzen AI 9 465 30278
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.16 13.03
Physical cores 32 10
Threads 64 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7D12 has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 465, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 203.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7D12 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7D12 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 465 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7D12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7D12 and Ryzen AI 9 465, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.