Xeon Phi 7120A vs EPYC 7C13
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 68 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.18 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | 2021 (4 years ago) | 6 April 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 244 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.24 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 350 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Phi 7120A.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 64 | 61 |
| Threads | 128 | 244 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
EPYC 7C13 has 4.9% more physical cores, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7120A, on the other hand, has 90.6% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7C13 and Intel Xeon Phi 7120A. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
