Xeon Gold 6226R vs EPYC 7C13

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7C13
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
43.45
+189%
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
15.02

EPYC 7C13 outperforms Xeon Gold 6226R by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking61505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.05
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.164.23
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2021 (4 years ago)24 February 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,300

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7C13 43.45
+189%
Xeon Gold 6226R 15.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7C13 76363
+189%
Samples: 54
Xeon Gold 6226R 26405
Samples: 21

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.45 15.02
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7C13 has a 189.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 6226R, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6226R in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7C13 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6226R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7C13 and Xeon Gold 6226R, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.