VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs EPYC 7C13
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7C13 outperforms Nano QuadCore L4700 by a whopping 10210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 69 | 3208 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | VIA |
| Power efficiency | 20.63 | 1.61 |
| Designer | AMD | VIA |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | CNQ (2011) |
| Release date | 2021 (4 years ago) | 12 May 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1333 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 2x 66 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | VIA nanoBGA2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 43.30 | 0.42 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 4 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 7C13 has a 10209.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, on the other hand, has 703.6% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7C13 is a server/workstation processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
