EPYC 9335 vs EPYC 7C13
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 77 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.17 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 2021 (5 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,178 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 9335.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 64 | 32 |
| Threads | 128 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 210 Watt |
EPYC 7C13 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7C13 and AMD EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
