EPYC 7542 vs EPYC 7C13

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7C13
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
43.43
+68.3%

EPYC 7C13 outperforms EPYC 7542 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking59227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.82
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.164.85
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2021 (4 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7C13 43.43
+68.3%
EPYC 7542 25.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7C13 76322
+68.3%
EPYC 7542 45359

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.43 25.81
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64

EPYC 7C13 has a 68.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 7542 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
AMD EPYC 7542
EPYC 7542

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7C13 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7542 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7C13 and EPYC 7542, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.