Core 2 Extreme QX9775 vs EPYC 7C13

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking69not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency20.64no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date2021 (4 years ago)24 March 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data1600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)6 MB (per die)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die size8x 81 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million820 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775.

PCIe version4.01.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 7C13 has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme QX9775, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7C13 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7C13 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9775 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7C13
EPYC 7C13
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Core 2 Extreme QX9775

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7C13 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 57 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9775 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7C13 and Core 2 Extreme QX9775, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.