Athlon 200GE vs EPYC 7C13
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7C13 outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 1758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 69 | 2002 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.27 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | 8.17 | 2.83 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 2021 (4 years ago) | 1 June 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $55 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 209.78 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and Athlon 200GE.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 43.29 | 2.33 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 2 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC 7C13 has a 1757.9% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 200GE, on the other hand, has 542.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 200GE in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7C13 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 200GE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
