Ryzen AI 9 465 vs EPYC 7773X
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7773X outperforms Ryzen AI 9 465 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 49 | 676 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 7.87 | 19.65 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 22 March 2022 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | no data |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7773X and Ryzen AI 9 465.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 52.17 | 13.03 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 10 |
| Threads | 128 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 7773X has a 300.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 540% more physical cores and 540% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 465, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 465 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
