Processor 300T vs EPYC 7763

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
52.85
+1266%
Processor 300T
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
3.87

EPYC 7763 outperforms Processor 300T by a whopping 1266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking291472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.36no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.9910.54
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,890$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.45 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2163 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP31700
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7763 52.85
+1266%
Processor 300T 3.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7763 84641
+1264%
Processor 300T 6205

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.85 3.87
Recency 15 March 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 7763 has a 1265.6% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 700% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor 300T in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7763 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
Intel Processor 300T
Processor 300T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1198 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Processor 300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7763 or Processor 300T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.