Ryzen Threadripper 7970X vs EPYC 7742

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7742
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
44.73
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
63.16
+41.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X outperforms EPYC 7742 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.70no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Storm Peak
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950no data
Current price$1656 (0.2x MSRP)$2499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.25 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

PCIe versionno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7742 44.73
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 63.16
+41.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X outperforms EPYC 7742 by 41% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7742 69183
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 97702
+41.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X outperforms EPYC 7742 by 41% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.73 63.16
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 350 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7742 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 27 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.