EPYC 9754S vs EPYC 7742

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.20no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Bergamo
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950no data
Current price$1696 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)128
Threads128256
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm28x 73 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million71,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 13 June 2023
Physical cores 64 128
Threads 128 256
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and EPYC 9754S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
AMD EPYC 9754S
EPYC 9754S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate EPYC 9754S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or EPYC 9754S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.