Ryzen 5 7520U vs EPYC 7713

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
54.12
+799%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 799% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking281112
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.84no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency21.9336.60
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,060no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.68 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7713 54.12
+799%
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7713 82825
+800%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9206

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7713 1579
+32.5%
Ryzen 5 7520U 1192

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7713 15297
+306%
Ryzen 5 7520U 3769

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.12 6.02
Recency 12 January 2021 20 September 2022
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7713 has a 799% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7713 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1394 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7713 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.