Xeon Platinum 8358 vs EPYC 7702P

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
41.54
+16.9%
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
35.53

EPYC 7702P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5287
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.6812.74
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,425no data
Current price$3722 (0.8x MSRP)$4299
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8358 has 19% better value for money than EPYC 7702P.

Technical specs

EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702P 41.54
+16.9%
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.53

EPYC 7702P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7702P 63633
+16.9%
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416

EPYC 7702P outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 17% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 41.54 35.53
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 250 Watt

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8358 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702P and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 32 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702P or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.