EPYC 7473X vs EPYC 7702P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.85
+6.8%
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
37.32

EPYC 7702P outperforms EPYC 7473X by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.67no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.7614.64
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,425no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads12848
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702P 39.85
+6.8%
EPYC 7473X 37.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7702P 63300
+6.8%
EPYC 7473X 59280

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.85 37.32
Recency 7 August 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 64 24
Threads 128 48
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 240 Watt

EPYC 7702P has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 20% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702P and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702P or EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.