Xeon E7310 vs EPYC 7702
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 104 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.74 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.26 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Tigerton (2007) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | 5 September 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,450 | $856 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 4 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 66 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 4 |
| Socket | TR4 | PGA604,PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 5 September 2007 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 4 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 80 Watt |
EPYC 7702 has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7310, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7702 and Intel Xeon E7310. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
