A8-6500T vs EPYC 7702

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702
2019, $6,450
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.46
+3392%

EPYC 7702 outperforms A8-6500T by a whopping 3392% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking972633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.33no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.321.06
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)16 September 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon™ HD 8550D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7702 39.46
+3392%
A8-6500T 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7702 68811
+3370%
Samples: 45
A8-6500T 1983
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.46 1.13
Recency 7 August 2019 16 September 2013
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7702 has a 3392% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

A8-6500T, on the other hand, has 344% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-6500T in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702 is a server/workstation processor while A8-6500T is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 34 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 9 votes

Rate A8-6500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7702 and A8-6500T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.