Opteron 6308 vs EPYC 7663
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 70 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.25 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.22 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 5 November 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,366 | $501 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 112 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 32 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 2x 315 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 4 |
| Socket | SP3 | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7663 and Opteron 6308.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 5 November 2012 |
| Physical cores | 56 | 4 |
| Threads | 112 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 115 Watt |
EPYC 7663 has an age advantage of 8 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 6308, on the other hand, has 109% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7663 and AMD Opteron 6308. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
