Ryzen AI 5 435G vs EPYC 7662
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 88 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.75 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Gorgon Point (2026) |
| Release date | 19 February 2020 (6 years ago) | 1 March 2026 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 4 MB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket SP3 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 840M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen AI 5 435G.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 February 2020 | 1 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 6 |
| Threads | 128 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 7662 has 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.
Ryzen AI 5 435G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7662 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 5 435G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
