Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs EPYC 7642

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
33.45
+187%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
11.64

EPYC 7642 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking129730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.18no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCRembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency6.2817.57
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)20 April 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads9616
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.75 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm6 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7642 33.45
+187%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 11.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+187%
Samples: 15
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 20451
Samples: 47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7642 1211
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 1473
+21.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7642 10317
+59.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z 6464

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.45 11.64
Recency 7 August 2019 20 April 2022
Physical cores 48 8
Threads 96 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7642 has a 187.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 703.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7642 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.