Xeon Phi 7250F vs EPYC 7601
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 339 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.69 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,200 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 68 (Octahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 272 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Xeon Phi 7250F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 68 |
| Threads | 64 | 272 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
EPYC 7601 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 27.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7250F, on the other hand, has 112.5% more physical cores and 325% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7601 and Intel Xeon Phi 7250F. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
