EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 7601

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
22.03
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
78.98
+259%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7601 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.776.92
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Genoa
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,200$11,805
Current price$200 (0x MSRP)$6347 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7601 has 561% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)96
Threads64192
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 22.03
EPYC 9654 78.98
+259%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7601 by 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7601 34079
EPYC 9654 122164
+258%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7601 by 258% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7601 792
EPYC 9654 1834
+132%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7601 by 132% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7601 7699
EPYC 9654 18666
+142%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7601 by 142% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.03 78.98
Recency 29 June 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 96
Threads 64 192
Cost $4200 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7601 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 983 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7601 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.