Atom x7433FE vs EPYC 7601
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 340 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.45 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.83 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Naples (2017−2018) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 October 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,200 | $75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 170.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Atom x7433FE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2017 | 1 October 2025 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 7601 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
Atom x7433FE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7601 and Intel Atom x7433FE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7433FE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
