Ryzen Threadripper 7980X vs EPYC 75F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.29
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
87.35
+97.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X outperforms EPYC 75F3 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.14no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Storm Peak
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860no data
Current price$3300 (0.7x MSRP)$4992

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2.95 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 71 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 75F3 44.29
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 87.35
+97.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X outperforms EPYC 75F3 by 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 75F3 68505
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 135107
+97.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X outperforms EPYC 75F3 by 97% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.29 87.35
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 350 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 75F3 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 35 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or Ryzen Threadripper 7980X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.