Ryzen 5 8500G vs EPYC 75F3

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.13
+215%
Ryzen 5 8500G
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
13.69

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 5 8500G by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.5819.93
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed2.95 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier29.5no data
L1 cache2 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12814

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 75F3 43.13
+215%
Ryzen 5 8500G 13.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 75F3 68505
+215%
Ryzen 5 8500G 21743

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.13 13.69
Recency 12 January 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 75F3 has a 215% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 8500G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 330.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 8500G in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen 5 8500G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
Ryzen 5 8500G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 242 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 75F3 or Ryzen 5 8500G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.