Opteron 6212 vs EPYC 75F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 75F3
2021, $4,860
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
36.86
+1524%
Opteron 6212
2011, $266
8 cores / 8 threads, 115 Watt
2.27

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Opteron 6212 by a whopping 1524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1142058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.390.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency5.550.83
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date15 March 2021 (5 years ago)14 November 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,860$266

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 2103% better value for money than Opteron 6212.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.95 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier29.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per module)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography7 nm+32 nm
Die size8x 81 mm22x 315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketSP3G34
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212.

PCIe version4.02.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 75F3 36.86
+1524%
Opteron 6212 2.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 75F3 64505
+1524%
Samples: 3
Opteron 6212 3973
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.86 2.27
Recency 15 March 2021 14 November 2011
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 115 Watt

EPYC 75F3 has a 1524% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6212, on the other hand, has 143% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6212 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6212 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 75F3 and Opteron 6212, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.