A4-9120C SoC vs EPYC 75F3
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 106 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.39 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.00 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,860 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 64 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.95 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 29.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Radeon R4E 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 75F3 and A4-9120C SoC.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 2 |
| Threads | 64 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC 75F3 has an age advantage of 2 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9120C SoC, on the other hand, has 4566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 75F3 and AMD A4-9120C SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation processor while A4-9120C SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
