Xeon Gold 6314U vs EPYC 7552

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7552
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 200 Watt
38.58
+27.6%
Xeon Gold 6314U
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
30.23

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon Gold 6314U by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking75139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.38no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.2613.96
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,025no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads9664
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7552 38.58
+27.6%
Xeon Gold 6314U 30.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7552 61282
+27.6%
Xeon Gold 6314U 48013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.58 30.23
Recency 7 August 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 48 32
Threads 96 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7552 has a 27.6% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6314U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Xeon Gold 6314U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6314U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7552 or Xeon Gold 6314U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.