i9-13700HX vs EPYC 7552
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 157 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.59 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Raptor Lake-HX |
| Power efficiency | 6.92 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,025 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 192 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Core i9-13700HX.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 48 | 16 |
| Threads | 96 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 7552 has 200% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
i9-13700HX, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7552 and Intel Core i9-13700HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7552 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13700HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
