Celeron N5095A vs EPYC 7552

Place in the ranking	74	1716
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.24	no data
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Power efficiency	18.26	16.35
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date	7 August 2019 (5 years ago)	1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,025	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	96	4
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.35 GHz	2.9 GHz
Multiplier	22	no data
L1 cache	3 MB	no data
L2 cache	24 MB	1.5 MB
L3 cache	192 MB (shared)	4 MB
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	10 nm
Die size	192 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	3,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	SP3	BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	-
vPro	no data	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Smart Response	no data	-
GPIO	no data	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-
Precision Boost 2	+	no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
Identity Protection	-	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	16 GB
Max memory channels	8	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	N/A	Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	750 MHz
Execution Units	no data	16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	3
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
MIPI-DSI	no data	+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12
OpenGL	no data	4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version	4.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	128	8
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	no data	2
Number of USB ports	no data	14
Integrated LAN	no data	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7552 40.04
+1388%

Celeron N5095A 2.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7552 61282
+1388%

Celeron N5095A 4118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	40.04	2.69
Recency	7 August 2019	1 July 2021
Physical cores	48	4
Threads	96	4
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	15 Watt

EPYC 7552 has a 1388.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095A in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7552 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.