Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs EPYC 7551P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
24.43
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.92
+22.5%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms EPYC 7551P by a significant 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking180129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.20no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data
Current price$531 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)38
Threads6476
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data58 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551P 24.43
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.92
+22.5%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms EPYC 7551P by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551P 38117
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+22.5%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms EPYC 7551P by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.43 29.92
Recency 29 June 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 32 38
Threads 64 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 270 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551P and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 66 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551P or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.