EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 7551P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7551P
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
24.64
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.97
+90.6%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7551P by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.36no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data
Current price$529 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)32 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551P 24.64
EPYC 7662 46.97
+90.6%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7551P by 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551P 38117
EPYC 7662 72653
+90.6%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7551P by 91% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.64 46.97
Recency 29 June 2017 19 February 2020
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551P and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551P
EPYC 7551P
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 66 votes

Rate EPYC 7551P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551P or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.