Atom 230 vs EPYC 7551

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking469not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Atom
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$29
Current price$252 (0.1x MSRP)$170 (5.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7551 and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads642
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7551 and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB8 GB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and Atom 230.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551 22463
+13192%
Atom 230 169

EPYC 7551 outperforms Atom 230 by 13192% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 1 March 2008
Physical cores 32 1
Threads 64 2
Cost $3400 $29
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7551 and Atom 230. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7551 is a server/workstation processor while Atom 230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 51 vote

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.