Core i9-11900F vs EPYC 7543P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7543P
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
43.12
+196%

EPYC 7543P outperforms i9-11900F by a whopping 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking46467
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.4246.71
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,730no data
Current price$2018 (0.7x MSRP)$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-11900F has 118% better value for money than EPYC 7543P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache2 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+14 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7543P 43.12
+196%
i9-11900F 14.55

EPYC 7543P outperforms Core i9-11900F by 196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7543P 66687
+196%
i9-11900F 22512

EPYC 7543P outperforms Core i9-11900F by 196% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.12 14.55
Recency 12 January 2021 16 March 2021
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7543P is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-11900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7543P and Core i9-11900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P
Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7543P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 226 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7543P or Core i9-11900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.