Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs EPYC 7543
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 82 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 16.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,761 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 28 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 4 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2021 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC 7543 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 703.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
