EPYC 9374F vs EPYC 7543

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7543
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
38.34
EPYC 9374F
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
50.25
+31.1%

EPYC 9374F outperforms EPYC 7543 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.047.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.1214.85
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,761$4,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7543 has 9% better value for money than EPYC 9374F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier2838.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7543 38.34
EPYC 9374F 50.25
+31.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7543 60901
EPYC 9374F 79826
+31.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.34 50.25
Recency 15 March 2021 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 320 Watt

EPYC 7543 has 42.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9374F, on the other hand, has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7543 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7543 and EPYC 9374F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7543
EPYC 7543
AMD EPYC 9374F
EPYC 9374F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7543 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9374F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7543 or EPYC 9374F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.