Athlon XP-M 1300+ vs EPYC 7543
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 128 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 6.63 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 15 March 2021 (5 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,761 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 28 | 11 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 130 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 4 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7543 and Athlon XP-M 1300+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 32 | 1 |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 16 Watt |
EPYC 7543 has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 1300+, on the other hand, has 1306% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD Athlon XP-M 1300+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7543 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP-M 1300+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
