EPYC 9655P vs EPYC 7513

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+168%

EPYC 9655P outperforms EPYC 7513 by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking831
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.242.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.6623.66
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7513 has 329% better value for money than EPYC 9655P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)96
Threads64192
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+4 nm
Die size8x 81 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 37.32
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+168%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7513 59285
EPYC 9655P 158845
+168%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.32 100.00
Recency 15 March 2021 10 October 2024
Physical cores 32 96
Threads 64 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 400 Watt

EPYC 7513 has 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 168% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7513 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 246 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.