Core i9-14900F vs EPYC 7513

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.33
+18.9%

EPYC 7513 outperforms i9-14900F by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking70114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.93no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Raptor Lake-R
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840no data
Current price$1651 (0.6x MSRP)$529

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 38.33
+18.9%
i9-14900F 32.23

EPYC 7513 outperforms Core i9-14900F by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7513 59285
+18.9%
i9-14900F 49851

EPYC 7513 outperforms Core i9-14900F by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.33 32.23
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 32
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-14900F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.