Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs EPYC 7502P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 144 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.29 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Power efficiency | 16.94 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| Release date | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,300 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.35 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 1.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | no data |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 August 2019 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 16 |
| Threads | 64 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC 7502P has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 227.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7502P and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
