Ryzen 5 3450U vs EPYC 7502P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502P
2019, $2,300
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
28.98
+681%

EPYC 7502P outperforms Ryzen 5 3450U by a whopping 681% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1951640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency17.29no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)1 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,300no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt2 MB + 4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7502P 28.98
+681%
Ryzen 5 3450U 3.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7502P 51206
+681%
Samples: 39
Ryzen 5 3450U 6556
Samples: 319

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.98 3.71
Recency 7 August 2019 1 May 2020
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 2 Watt

EPYC 7502P has a 681.1% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 3450U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 8900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3450U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 39 votes

Rate EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 410 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7502P and Ryzen 5 3450U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.