Ryzen 9 3900XT vs EPYC 7502

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
31.35
+46.8%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Ryzen 9 3900XT by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking136268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.5425.12
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency15.8818.54
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Matisse 2 (2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,600$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900XT has 233% better value for money than EPYC 7502.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache2 MB768 KB
L2 cache16 MB6 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7502 31.35
+46.8%
Ryzen 9 3900XT 21.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7502 47983
+46.9%
Ryzen 9 3900XT 32666

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.35 21.35
Recency 7 August 2019 16 June 2020
Physical cores 32 12
Threads 64 24
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 7502 has a 46.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 9 3900XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3900XT in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3900XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502 and Ryzen 9 3900XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 416 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502 or Ryzen 9 3900XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.