7 245HX vs EPYC 7502

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502
2019, $2,600
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.35
+25.4%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Core 7 245HX by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Arrow Lake
Power efficiency6.92no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026)
Release date7 August 2019 (6 years ago)1 April 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,600no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads6414
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache16 MB24 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)26 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7502 30.35
+25.4%
7 245HX 24.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7502 51871
+25.4%
Samples: 12
7 245HX 41358
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.35 24.20
Recency 7 August 2019 1 April 2026
Physical cores 32 14
Threads 64 14
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm

EPYC 7502 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, and 129% more physical cores and 357% more threads.

7 245HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 7 245HX in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 245HX is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 13 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 245HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7502 and Core 7 245HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.