EPYC 9334 vs EPYC 7501

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7501
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 170 Watt
16.11
EPYC 9334
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 210 Watt
41.92
+160%

EPYC 9334 outperforms EPYC 7501 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking38651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0216.57
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Genoa
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$2,990
Current price$900 (0.3x MSRP)$2450 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9334 has 175% better value for money than EPYC 7501.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm24x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7501 16.11
EPYC 9334 41.92
+160%

EPYC 9334 outperforms EPYC 7501 by 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7501 24925
EPYC 9334 64841
+160%

EPYC 9334 outperforms EPYC 7501 by 160% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.11 41.92
Recency 29 June 2017 10 November 2022
Cost $3400 $2990
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 210 Watt

The EPYC 9334 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7501 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7501 and EPYC 9334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7501
EPYC 7501
AMD EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7501 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7501 or EPYC 9334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.